Microsoft Word - SEA-ÃÒ©ºÑº 6-3-51.doc (Unofficial Translation)* Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 _________________ BHU BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX., Given on the day of 23rd February B.E

) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. Komgrich as aider or abettor was also named in the complaint for violating Section 312 in conjunction with Section 315 of the SEA. On December 29

entires of revenues from sales in SINGHA 's 2007 financial statements in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535(1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code.  The DSI and public prosecutors probed into the case and decided to pursue charges against them

SEC is proposing to amend the SEA in the part related to the preparation and submission of interim financial statements of listed companies. The amendment would allow SEC to have more flexibility in

issued under Section 58 (1), which is liable to the offenses under Section 274 and Section 281/10 in conjunction with Section 58 (1) of the SEA, and the case where EARTH disclosed misleading statements

296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2559 (2016), as amended, (SEA). As aider and abettor, Amornrat and Walailuk violated Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1) which

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1

/ (Decrease) Percentage Sea Freight 150.77 178.21 (27.44) (15.40) Air Freight 192.94 105.73 87.21 82.48 Logistics Management 85.47 71.76 13.71 19.11 Total Service Revenue 429.18 355.70 73.48 20.66 1. Revenue

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr. Suthisak Lohsawat and a juristic person whose major shareholders