annual interest rate of 7.5 percent of the said principal, as from the case filing date (26 December 2018) until the date of completing the total payment to the plaintiff. In addition, the defendant was
. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of
2019, the Civil Court passed a judgment in the Decided Case No. Por. 899/2562 ordering Surasak to pay 522,500 baht and a 7.5 percent annual interest of 22,500 baht, starting from the case filing date
’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the
Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal Region I, Dr. Poomsiri Dumrongvute, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University, and Mr. Jinnah Yamuam, Money and Banking subcommittee member, Thailand
funds, (3) promoting governance and good standards of financial institutions and corporate whereby investors? best interest is considered paramount, and (4) developing tools to empower investors. The plan
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court's
baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court?s
who wish to offer securities, either cross-border equity offering or DR, in Thailand. In the course of the discussion, the representative from World Bank (Thailand) also expresses the interest in
Nuprapat and Kanchana with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court and the Appeal Court ruled against Nuprapat and Kanchana and sentenced them to a five-year imprisonment for