} for one month from their duties as approved capital market investment consultants effective from March 27, 2014. For {B} who had already been suspended by his employer for fifteen days, however, the

imposed by {A}'s former employer, the SEC will not consider his application for approval as capital market personnel for one year eleven months and fourteen days, starting from December 20, 2013 

she has already been suspended by her employer for three months, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served.  

securities investment consultant for one month. Having considered that she had already been subject to one-month suspension imposed by her employer, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been

Investment and Giving Investment Advice dated January 18, 2012. In this regard, the SEC suspended {A} for six months. Taking into account that she has already been suspended by her employer for one month and

her then employer, the SEC probed into the {D} case and found the investment advice records and e-mails indicating that {D} had been entrusted to trade derivatives on behalf of a client during November

his employer for four months, the suspension imposed by the SEC has already been served.

capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended {A} from her duty as the approved capital market investment consultant for 2 months. Taking into account that {A} had already been suspended by her employer; the

his duty as the approved capital market investment consultant for 8 months. Taking into account that Atthapol had already been suspended by his employer for 15 days; the suspension imposed by the SEC

. Taking into account that {A} had already been suspended by his employer for a month 7 days, however, the suspension imposed by the SEC shall remain 4 months 23 days, effective from December 11, 2014.Note