final court judgment on the basis of an offense related to assets particularly due to deceitful, fraudulent or dishonest acts that results in widespread damage, either in accordance with Thai or foreign
to support such policy? 3. Has the company's inspection ever revealed dishonest acts of its employees or executives? If so, how has the company dealt with such cases? And what are the company's
to support such policy? 3. Has the company's inspection ever revealed dishonest acts of its employees or executives? If so, how has the company dealt with such cases? And what are the company's
which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained
in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
subsidiaries in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
account of jointly committing dishonest acts to misappropriate TRITN assets, failing to perform duties responsibly, and consenting to preparation of incorrect accounting records, in many circumstances, as
jointly committing dishonest acts to misappropriate TRITN assets, failing to perform duties responsibly, and consenting to preparation of incorrect accounting records, in many circumstances, as follows: 1
jointly committing dishonest acts to misappropriate TRITN assets, failing to perform duties responsibly, and consenting to preparation of incorrect accounting records, in many circumstances, as follows: 1
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case