(1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008) and Section 114, Section 115 and Section 116 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992), which contain certain

amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008) and Section 114, Section 115 and Section 116 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992), which contain certain provisions in

), which contain certain provisions in relation to restriction of rights and liberties of persons which Section 29, in conjunction with Section 33, Section 34, Section 41, Section 43, Section 44 and Section

Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008) and Section 114, Section 115 and Section 116 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992), which contain certain provisions in relation to the restriction of

(No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008) and Section 114, Section 115 and Section 116 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992), which contain certain provisions in relation to the restriction of rights and

University INTRODUCTION • What is the effect of regulatory jurisdiction on the behavior of financial actors? Specifically, investment adviser misconduct? • Setting: Dodd-Fank re-jurisdicts “mid-size” RIAs in

Acquisition or Disposal of Assets”). After calculating as per various criteria, the maximum calculated value of the transaction size under total consideration value is 12.50 % based on latest financial

currently the Company’s major shareholder, and the transaction size is equal to MB 358.01, which is more than the amount of MB 20.00 (NTA cannot be calculated because the NTA of the company is negative

(referred to in some jurisdictions as the “oppressed minority,” “appraisal” or “buy-out” remedy) give shareholders the right to have the company buy their shares upon the occurrence of certain fundamental

size of the Transaction is calculated to be at the highest of 5.43% pursuant to the Comparison of Consideration Paid criteria (calculated from the reviewed consolidated financial statements of the