action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
-W1 during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and
during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the
offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
Statistics of Criminal Actions (As of 31 December 2023) Cases Persons Cases Persons Cases Persons Cases Persons Fraud 0 0 3 17 0 0 3 14 Fail to exercise duty of care 0 0 - - 0 0 - - Disclosure of