. In addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself
recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
inconsistency with normal market condition. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing
normal market condition. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing others to
. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing others to use their trading
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307