reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 209,250 and a further fine of Baht 1000 for everyday during which the contravention continued. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) 4 (SEC Logo and contact information) 30 November 2016 Dear Managers: All securities companies All derivatives brokers No. SEC. Nor Por. (Wor) 30/2559 Re: Submission of Daily
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) (SEC Logo and contact information) 30 November 2016 Dear Managers: All securities companies All derivatives brokers No. SEC. Nor Por. (Wor) 30/2559 Re: Submission of Daily
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) (SEC Logo and contact information) 30 November 2016 Dear Managers: All securities companies All derivatives brokers No. SEC. Nor Por. (Wor) 30/2559 Re: Submission of Daily
comprehensively study the contract specification, i.e. category or type of underlying assets or variables, contract size/unit/multiplier, minimum price movement, daily price limit, last trading day, settlement day
comprehensively study the contract specification, i.e. category or type of underlying assets or variables, contract size/unit/multiplier, minimum price movement, daily price limit, last trading day, settlement day
futures, the investor should comprehensively study the contract specification, i.e. category or type of underlying assets or variables, contract size/unit/multiplier, minimum price movement, daily price
in a fine of Baht 209,250 and a further fine of Baht 1000 for everyday during which the contravention continued. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 04/06/2014
.{A} case was referred from the Stock Exchange of Thailand for the SEC's further investigation while cases of {B} and {C} were detected by the SEC's routine inspection. The SEC found from the probe that
trading orders, effective from January 19, 2013.The SEC found from its routine inspection that {A} had failed to record her investment advice and a client's securities trading orders for 14 days as