and obligations of the listed companies. In particular, true sale and borrowing transactions are different in respect of accounting record and thus significantly affect the companies? profits in each
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
Limited), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to manipulate the KIAT
), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
Limited), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
Limited), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to
), (10) Miss Rinnapa Kunawatsatit, (11) Mr. Patinya Dheva-aksorn, (12) Mrs. Kingkarn Smitananda, and (13) Mr. Praphol Milindachinla. The said persons cooperated by acting in different manners to