to support such policy? 3. Has the company's inspection ever revealed dishonest acts of its employees or executives? If so, how has the company dealt with such cases? And what are the company's
account of jointly committing dishonest acts to misappropriate TRITN assets, failing to perform duties responsibly, and consenting to preparation of incorrect accounting records, in many circumstances, as
jointly committing dishonest acts to misappropriate TRITN assets, failing to perform duties responsibly, and consenting to preparation of incorrect accounting records, in many circumstances, as follows: 1
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 and 281/2 paragraph 2 in
distillation. That was deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 315 in
deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 315 in conjunction with 86