evidently and concretely. As the TIA is a shareholder of each and every listed company that committed to taking action in this front, the SEC therefore will definitely support the TIA, in terms of legal
paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the
, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and
inconsistent with the facts to deceive other persons. He committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million
other persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million baht. Mr. Sutin and
the facts to deceive other persons. Mr. Bhusana Committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million
other persons. Mr. Bhusana Committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million baht. Mr. Sutin
the facts to deceive other persons. Mr. Bhusana Committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million
disclosed to the public. Mrs. Usuma and Miss Thitirat rendered assistance to his commission of the offense. 31/10/2023 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense
defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to jointly reimburse court fees to