and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the
(2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was
), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
August 8, 2013, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 91,800. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 45,900
August 8, 2013, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 73,400. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 36,700
December 24, 2014, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 364,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 182,000 and a
specified period. On December 24, 2014, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 227,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht
) to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 121,500. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half
SEC and the SET within specified period. .The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 534,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a