;the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited ("GISP
Limited ("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited
Company Limited ("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company
("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited ("GISP
Limited ("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited
("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited ("GISP
publicized through telephone, leaflets, brochures, event booths at office buildings and Facebook advertisements.Such acts may be unlawful and constitute an offence of luring and offering unauthorized
discussing with her client to fine-tune the deficit portfolio. At the end of the trading day, she notified her client via mobile telephone after working hours.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of
client of trading orders via telephone at the end of the trading day.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
confirmed the clients' trading orders via telephone, as she understood that these could have been evidence of the clients' trading orders. However, {A} failed to record her accepting of security trading