Company Limited (UKEM) through seven securities trading accounts in concealment, on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in UKEM share trading values and
Company Limited (UKEM) through seven securities trading accounts in concealment, on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in UKEM share trading values and
Limited (TYM) (now known as The Steel Pubic Company Limited (THE)) through 9 securities trading accounts. They traded TYM shares in the manner that concealing, inflating and stabilizing the share price and
Limited (TYM) (now known as The Steel Pubic Company Limited (THE)) through 9 securities trading accounts. They traded TYM shares in the manner that concealing, inflating and stabilizing the share price and
(TYM) (now known as The Steel Pubic Company Limited (THE)) through 9 securities trading accounts. They traded TYM shares in the manner that concealing, inflating and stabilizing the share price and
manner that concealing, inflating and stabilizing the share price and matching orders within the group which caused TYM share price inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead the general public
BLISS’s assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG
assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG-W1
, the first and third quarters of 2013, and the year 2013 in order to avoid revealing the details of his related persons who entered into share trading transactions with RAM during 2012-2013. The public
, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid Mr.Bhusana with the money received from the share sale. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 89