any way. The SEC has considered that Pongsak’s misconduct of performing duties irresponsibly without professional due care is in violation of Clause 23(2) and he is deemed to have the prohibited
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
could remain an IFEC shareholder and exercise the voting right to select company directors at three shareholders’ meeting in 2017. It is considered that His such failure violated a law and he illegally
benefit, the actual price was 40 million baht. Therefore, their acts were considered that they dishonestly violated duties as well as obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person and caused
benefit, the actual price was 40 million baht. Therefore, their acts were considered that they dishonestly violated duties as well as obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person and caused
benefit, the actual price was 40 million baht. Therefore, their acts were considered that they dishonestly violated duties as well as obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person and caused
Mr.Apichart's benefit, the actual price was 40 million baht. Therefore, their acts were considered that they dishonestly violated duties as well as obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person