}, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A} persuaded his client to invest in derivatives contracts by exaggerating return from investment. He had prepared his own documents for giving

consolidation of the acquired hotel business in Europe. 2) Revenue from the office for rent business of Baht 38.6 million from office building in London, U.K. 3) Other revenue of Baht 82.5 million, which grew by

follows:   (1)  During February – March 2017, Nutnicha solicited a client to buy IPO shares of a company, claiming that she had the right to buy such shares as an employee of Apple Wealth Securities. She

Audit Firm Name: Subject: CLIENT ACCEPTANCE AND CONTINUANCE Prepared By: …………. Date: ……………….. CLIENT ACCEPTANCE AND CONTINUANCE: . Such policies and procedures provides reasonable assurance that the

. The increase was predominantly due to the consolidation of the acquired hotel business in Europe. 2) Revenue from the office for rent business of Baht 40.9 million, which grew by Baht 31.4 million or

 {A} had solicited a client to invest in derivatives products by guaranteeing returns; the client agreed to the deal and allowed him to make investment decisions on the client's behalf. Later, he was

the client mutual fund investment advice describing that the principal would not be affected. The said advice was given, even though the client made investment in a mixed fund having medium to high risk

negligent with regard to supervision of the company?s core work systems.   Regarding the share transfer case, Auracha, then an investment consultant at AEC, was found transfering shares in the client?s

investment consultants above work for the KASIKORNBANK Public Company Limited (KBANK).In the cases of (1) and (2), {A} affixed her signature as the investment consultant for a person who was not her client

sufficient information by concealing important information that might adverse affect the client's benefits. Following the report of UOB Kay Hian Securities (Thailand) Plc. and a client complaint, the SEC