. During February 2019, Mr. Anurak placed purchasing and selling orders of BTC BCH ETH and XRP to match with each other which misled other persons regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those
performance of liquidity providing. During February 2019, LLC Fair Expo placed purchasing and selling orders of BTC ETH and XRP to match with each other which misled other persons regarding the purchase volume
performance of liquidity providing. During February 2019, LLC Fair Expo placed purchasing and selling orders of BTC ETH and XRP to match with each other which misled other persons regarding the purchase volume
other persons regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, Bitkub by Mr. Sakolkorn acknowledged such action but did not oppose. Bitkub’s offence was resulted
regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. Satang’s
regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. LLC Fair
regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. Satang’s
International Engineering Public Company Limited (IEC), in the case where IEC did not exercise the right to purchase shares of Kokcharoen Green Energy Company Limited (KE) at the amount of 45 million baht
shares and voting as proxy for shareholders in the agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal
and proposing special agenda to purchase Kitha’s shares. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry