Q2/2018, compared with the same period of 2017, comes from the adjustment of the provision from liabilities in Joint Venture according to the Supreme Court judgment which has previously been recorded

} and has been in the process of bringing {B} before the Criminal Court.On March 14, 2011, the Criminal Court passed the judgment that {A} had violated Section 243(1), (2) and Section 244 (2), (3) of the

judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange

containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the

fine of Baht 30,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(1)(2)(3)(4) and 199 Criminal Complaint

date (27 December 2018) until the date of completing the full payment – to SEC, the plaintiff.12/11/2019 The Civil Court has a judgment to dismiss the case.27/12/2018 filed a lawsuit to a

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA