Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Ms. Somboon Pangphet Ms. Somboon Pangphet failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The Court sentenced the accused to 15-day imprisonment and a fine of Baht 2,000. The jail term, however
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, attempt to
(Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. In case of the audited financial statements for the year 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 10,000 Baht and a further
committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E
committing unlicensed digital asset exchange offense. On March 7, 2024, the Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 3, 26 and 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E
January 17, 2022 totally 257,300 Baht. The amount of total fine for the accused is 261,300 Baht. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 08/12/2022
sentenced the accused to three year imprisonment. As the accused’s plea was useful to proceeding, the Court reduced the punishment by one-third, resulting in two year imprisonment. SEC Act S.90 and Section
the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. On June 9, 2011, the accused filed an appeal to the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of