(1) the changing IT usage in business practices, (2) the increasingly sophisticated technical approaches and mechanisms of cyber threats, (3) the revisions to preventive measures for addressing
on their behalf by those agents. As sophisticated investors with influence, often including voting rights, institutional https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/TH/Documents/Assessment/ICGN%20Institutional
Asset Management Co., Ltd.), has committed an offense with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for himself or another person by authorizing a mutual fund of Solaris Asset Management Co., Ltd. to
their interests and on their behalf by those agents. As sophisticated investors with influence, often including voting rights, institutional https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/TH/Documents/Assessment/ICGN
to support such policy? 3. Has the company's inspection ever revealed dishonest acts of its employees or executives? If so, how has the company dealt with such cases? And what are the company's
which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained
in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
subsidiaries in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case