baht for the violation which occurred during August 18- October 7, 1992. The execution of imprisonments were not suspended.Later, the Appeal Court affirmed and amended the Bangkok South Criminal Court?s
2,666,666.67 Baht fine. The jail term was suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The
judgment of the Appeal Court that “the debtor is to pay xxx Baht together with 7.5% interest per year counting from 14th July 2016 onwards until the payment is completely made to the plaintiff. The fees in
, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of
Technology |- Business Continuity Management (BCM) |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays (Section 110) | - |- Segregation of Finance and Securities Business & Merger (Section 90
) | - |- Representatives Offices Establishment (Section 93) |- Complaint Handling |- Anti-money Laundering |- Information Technology |- Business Continuity Management (BCM) |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public
|- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays (Section 110) | - |- Segregation of Finance and Securities Business & Merger (Section 90) | - |- Related Organizations with Securities Business (Section 230
PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the
containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
utilizing the inside information for selling IFEC shares on 4 November 2016, totaling 10,153,186 shares, through his own trading account. 22/12/2020 The Appeal Court has rendered a judgement opposing the