Corporation (Thailand) without proper licenses granted. Such action was deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act of B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds
Corporation (Thailand) without proper licenses granted. Such action was deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition the operation constituted public frauds contravening
Corporation (Thailand) without proper licenses granted. Such action was deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening
Professionals who have been granted ACMF Pass. In this regard, they are referred to as “Recognised Representative” as defined in section 2 herein below. 1.2.4 Explaining the monitoring, supervisory and
. The acts of the 11 persons above, namely GGC former director and executive and their associates, were liable to offenses under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2, in conjunction with Section 89/24, Section
: Determination of Fees for Application for Offer for Sale of Newly Issued Securities and Application for Securitization Project (No. 7) By virtue of Section 14(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
. KorDor. 15/2553 Re: Determination of Fees for Undertaking Business of Licensed Derivatives Exchange By virtue of Section 9(2) of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) which contain certain provisions
offences committed by Bordin and Noparat were liable to violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and Section 83
from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of