. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
search criteria Security Type --- Select Security Type --- Common share Warrant-Preferred share Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Common share (LiVEx) DR-Common share Depositary Receipt DR-Convertible
Please enter search criteria Security Type --- Select Security Type --- Debenture Note Derivative Warrants Securitization Debenture Bond Basel Convertible Debenture IC Bond SUKUK Structured Debenture
Held Before Acquisition/ Disposition 2 % Group of Held Acquisition/ Disposition 2 % Group of Held After Acquisition/ Disposition 2 Remark 3 File No BCP SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE Disposition Stock 15.0384
in accordance with the ethical standards as specified in Section 5 of the Ethical Standards Act, as follows:(1) Loyalty to the core national institutions, i.e., Nation, Religion and Monarchy, as
important information and business secrets of the company without approval. He later resigned from the company. SEC has considered that Pusit failed to perform duties with loyalty* and therefore suspended
Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha While being a director of Jasmine International Public Company Limited (JAS), Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha failed to perform his duties with loyalty as a result of obtaining unusual
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which