lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
Revenue Department for the revenue entry for the fiscal year 1999 and 2000 that affects the utilization of tax benefits from the carried-over losses. The Central Tax Court has ruled that the Tender Offeror
of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the
Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
such contingent liability is related to the Company's litigation cases in 2012 - 2014. However, if after the court has ruled that the company wins the case, the Company will take these reserved amount
memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
gather information on name, last name, nationality, occupation, residential address, contacting address, name of ultimate beneficial owner, name of ultimate controlling person, name of the entity
name, nationality, occupation, residential address, contacting address, name of ultimate beneficial owner, name of ultimate controlling person, name of the entity, shareholding structure of the entity