SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed
the SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed final
. Later on September 21, 2012, he reduced the holding of CMO shares less than trigger point. SEC Act S.247 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 4/2015 Settlement Committee Order No. 37/2015 Dated 20/04/2015
, he reduced the holding of OCEAN shares less than trigger point. SEC Act S.247 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 5/2015 Settlement Committee Order No. 42/2015 Dated 11/06/2015
, 2015, he reduced the holding of TPP shares less than trigger point. SEC Act S.247 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 5/2015 Settlement Committee Order No. 41/2015 Dated 11/06/2015
Narongdej reduced his shareholding below such trigger point, he then was exempted from the requirement to make a tender offer. SEC Act S.247 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 9/2017 Settlement
inconsistent with the ever-advancing technologies and do not allow businesses to access necessary information sufficiently. The FinTech Act would not only reduce such limitations by allowing established
an electronic transaction and applying FinTech to business operation are still a challenge in Thailand mostly because the governing laws are inconsistent with the ever-advancing technologies and do not
Community (AEC), and the advancing digital age amid the rapid pace of technological advancement, thus leading to changing customer behavior, regulatory changes and life platform-driven competition. Given the