prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and

(paragraph ........); ( 2.1.2 incorrect use of accounting policy (paragraph........); ( 2.1.3 inappropriate/insufficient disclosure of information (paragraph........). ( 2.2 Inability to obtain sufficient

Misstatements that are material, but not pervasive, resulting from: ฆ 2.1.1 selection of an inappropriate accounting policy (paragraph ........); ฆ 2.1.2 incorrect use of accounting policy (paragraph........); ฆ

Official Dated 16/10/2017 misconduct above is deemed an execution of concealed transactions, asset misappropriation, permission of false accounting transactions and preparation of incorrect accounting

as well as submitting its Q3/2004 financial statements for the reasons that the submission of these incorrect financial statements will only confuse investors. As viewed that DAIDO?s above proposal

Thai accounting standards, i.e. (1) no cash flow statement included and (2) incomplete and incorrect information disclosures such as no disclosure of some connected transactions, figures as shown in

PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the

containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the

abetted the falsification of AMAC’s documents and accounts or preparation of incorrect 2008 and 2009 financial statements concerning purchasing raw materials, hiring for spare parts mold production, selling

colluded, or aided and abetted the falsification of AMAC’s documents and accounts or preparation of incorrect 2008 and 2009 financial statements concerning purchasing raw materials, hiring for spare parts