IFA opined that (1) APU share value is not reasonable as it is higher that the IFA?s appraised value at the maximum varied of 219.56 million baht; (2) the first purchase payment for acquisition of APU
based on reasonable evidence indicating that the said persons agreed or conspired with former executives of a securities company in using their own trading accounts or other persons? to manipulate the
are person under Section 258 of SUTGH; moreover, the Company’s Board of Directors shall provide opinions towards the following matters: 1) The Rational and Necessity to Increase Capital: As the Company
) Rational Securitie The Co Per Exp (10 NM Exp pro sha le in Fixing es Co., Ltd., valuation fr mpany riod for Asse pected Value 00%) MG’s shareho pected Value oportion to areholding In this rega according to
reasonable. The SEC thus instructed TIES to rectify the financial statements according to the auditor?s opinions and to be in line with the accounting standards. TIES must submit to the SEC and publicly
, both the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee view that such transaction is reasonable and beneficial to the company. However, the independent financial advisor is of the opinion that the
approved transactions and prevented risks to the fund. In addition, Maris inappropriately approved a fund payment and such amount of money was transferred to Burim without any reasonable ground to support
comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower