Company having differing opinions from the Board of Directors of the Company. The Audit Committee has the opinion in correspondence with the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Company, and none of the
opinions from the Board of Directors of the Company. The Audit Committee has the opinion in correspondence with the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Company, and none of the Director had the
differing opinions from the Board of Directors of the Company. The Audit Committee has the opinion in correspondence with the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Company, and none of the Director had the
Value and Criteria used in determining a transaction’s total value : Extending the maturity period of the loan in the amount of Baht 98.09 million (divided into principal of Baht 94 million and accrued
inventory physical count process, but simply sent a confirmation letter to the consignor. The letter did not require the consignor to send correspondence directly to the auditor and the evidence was obtained
result, the Company's debt to equity ratio increased from 1.46 times to 1.57. The company is considering extending its debt-to-equity ratio to the commercial banks. For the purpose of considering
concealing the fraud by extending the maturity terms of such B/E issues several times. The fraud was supported and assisted by (5) Thepthiwa, who knew Pattarapob and Sunchai. In so doing, Thepthiwa allowed his