the letter of guarantee. Part of such contingent liability is related to the Company's litigation cases in 2012 - 2014. However, if after the court has ruled that the company wins the case, the Company
lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not
Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
informational asymmetry (and implications against the EMH). • In April 2013, the US SEC ruled that companies could share important information through social media, but only if investors have been alerted about
of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the
Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company
such contingent liability is related to the Company's litigation cases in 2012 - 2014. However, if after the court has ruled that the company wins the case, the Company will take these reserved amount
memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in
management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not established any loss reserve in its accounts. Please be informed accordingly, Yours sincerely