the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio stemming from increased loans and lower shareholder equity, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. The interest coverage ratio
. However, Return on Equity slightly declined from 14% to 13.7% due to lower debt and more reliance on internal operating fund. From the financial risk perspective, debt to equity ratio decreased from 0.5x to
’ equity as mentioned above. For the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio comparing to previous year, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA
addition, the significant improvement of return on equity was from the decrease of shareholders’ equity as mentioned above. For the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio comparing to
governance outcomes: 1. competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective; 2. ethical and responsible business; 3. good corporate citizenship; and 4. corporate resilience
governance outcomes: 1. competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective; 2. ethical and responsible business; 3. good corporate citizenship; and 4. corporate resilience
work perspective in its job descriptions and evaluation forms? 6 Does the firm establish the career progression route and how are senior managers/directors promoted – what criteria are used? What is the
นำไปสู่ผล ( governance outcome ) อย่างน้อย ดังต่อไปนี้ 1 . สามารถแข่งขันได้และมีผลประกอบการที่ดีโดยคำนึงถึงผลกระทบในระยะยาว (Competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective) 2 . ประกอบ
(governance outcome) อย่างน้อย ดังต่อไปนี้ 1. สามารถแข่งขันได้และมีผลประกอบการที่ดีโดยคำนึงถึงผลกระทบในระยะยาว (Competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective) 2. ประกอบธุรกิจอย่างมี
(governance outcome) อย่างน้อย ดังต่อไปนี้ 1. สามารถแข่งขันได้และมีผลประกอบการที่ดีโดยคำนึงถึงผลกระทบในระยะยาว (Competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective) 2. ประกอบธุรกิจอย่างมี