instructions from the clients. They cannot make securities trading decisions on behalf of clients, regardless of the client's permission. In this regard, the actions of {B} and {A} were deemed as obtaining
his employer. The SEC then probed into the case and found from conversation records that Nongun had obtained authorization to trade derivatives for the client. He then proceeded to take the actions with
records that {B} had obtained authorization to trade derivatives for the client. He then proceeded to take the actions with such permission.In performing their duty, an investment consultant can send
No. KorNor. 2/2550 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Management Companies to Establish Branch Offices _____________ By virtue of Section 14
of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. KorNor. 2/2550 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Management Companies to Establish Branch
., for one-year eleven months and fourteen days. The period was set on the grounds of trading securities in the client?s account without permission, taking advantage of client by virtue of duty and
but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public
Financial (NZ) Ltd. had been registered with the SEC as derivatives dealer but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed
to order or act duty resulting in Beyond’s engagement in any other business which is not a licensed securities business without permission from the Capital Market Supervisory Boards approval which