the settlement procedure (SEC News No. 87/2014), but later failed to make fine payment in full as specified by the Settlement Committee.  The criminal case has thus not been regarded as settled.In this

trading orders were submitted via LINE.Failure to keep complete record of the securities trading orders were deemed as failure to perform the duties under Clause 23(3) and the prohibited characteristics of

SEC Secretary-General said “With respect to the policy of SEC to enhance the protection for investors in the capital market, auditors and audit firms is deemed to play an important part in the

any way. The SEC has considered that Pongsak’s misconduct of performing duties irresponsibly without professional due care is in violation of Clause 23(2) and he is deemed to have the prohibited

action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308

action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308

, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307

, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307

could remain an IFEC shareholder and exercise the voting right to select company directors at three shareholders’ meeting in 2017. It is considered that His such failure violated a law and he illegally

benefit, the actual price was 40 million baht. Therefore, their acts were considered that they dishonestly violated duties as well as obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person and caused