such allocation of the newly-issued ordinary shares, the Company reserves the right to consider not allocating the shares to any subscriber if such allocation causes or may cause the infringement of

were deemed a breach of duty under Clause 11 (1) and (2) of the Notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. SorKhor. 15/2548 Re: Approval for Investor Contacts and Standards

behalf of the client.  In this regard, Theera and Nongun?s actions were in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for

trading orders only when obtaining orders from the clients. Even with the client's permission; they cannot make decisions on behalf of the client.  In this regard, {A} and {B}'s actions were in violation of

embezzling client assets with the intention to deceive the client as well as interfering with client assets in breach of Clauses 11(1) and (2) of the Notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange

violation of Section 307, 311, 312(2) in conjunction with 313 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 ("SEA").On June 28, 2011, the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court convicted Suradej Mookayangkul, the

and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed

Investigation (DSI) for (1) failing to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly, (2) seeking unlawful gain for himself or other persons causing damage to the company, and (3) committing or permitting

deemed a failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and

since it does not require that all securities certificates be held in the scripless system. Those fraudsters, therefore, produce phony certificates to gain themselves unfair benefits. These fake