Department of Economic Crime Litigation 4 of the Office of the Attorney- General. This resulted in a lawsuit filed against the defendant.On March 30, 2015,  the Criminal Court ruled against Ratchasak for

Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not established any loss

the letter of guarantee. Part of such contingent liability is related to the Company's litigation cases in 2012 - 2014. However, if after the court has ruled that the company wins the case, the Company

lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not

Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company

informational asymmetry (and implications against the EMH). • In April 2013, the US SEC ruled that companies could share important information through social media, but only if investors have been alerted about

of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the

Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company

such contingent liability is related to the Company's litigation cases in 2012 - 2014. However, if after the court has ruled that the company wins the case, the Company will take these reserved amount

memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in