, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court dismissed the case. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an
The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI) by arranging trading accounts of other persons for Mr. Sagha, sending manipulative trading orders, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court
cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition and caused damages to other investors. 15/12/2020 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court
provided the collection and assessment of customer information (Know Your Customer / Customer Due Diligence) (KYC/CDD) systems for Satang to operate its business in accordance with relevant laws, regulations
penalty to be imposed on the offender. Appeal Any person who is affected by, and disagrees with, an administrative order has the right to appeal such order. The appeal procedure is provided by the SEC
) for the year 2001-2006 for the total amount of Baht 557 million, including cases under the consideration of the Supreme Court and Tax Appeal Committee of the Revenue Department (please find more details
depending on the severity of the case. If the penalized party disagrees with the SEC order, an appeal can be filed. Administrative sanction ensures that supervision will proceed stringently and efficiently
depending on the severity of the case. If the penalized party disagrees with the SEC order, an appeal can be filed. Administrative sanction ensures that supervision will proceed stringently and efficiently
’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the
) |- Auditors | - |- Approval (Section 30) |- Accounting and Financial Statements (Section 27, 28) |- Reporting Requirements |- Anti-money Laundering |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays