" (fluctuation) 6A !F"ก"EF 29t24SF 2 34 54ก 56K4ก@Dก !FB @D"E?QOก 24 Oก 4]"Aก B @4]"74SSFE FB 42 29t24S4= 3.7.1.10 2 34 54ก 5 !FB @D"E?QB
tools to evaluate, in the context of its particular financial situation, an investment in the Notes and the impact the Notes will have on its overall investment portfolio; (iii) have sufficient financial
related operational risk, and evaluate risks both internal and external that could affect the operation and the SEC’s strategic plan. Subsequently, control activities and working procedures are set up to
the asset value under the present conditions as much as possible. Therefore, it is the opinion of the IFA that the most appropriate approach to evaluate the asset is the Adjusted Book Value Approach
utility measure.” A utility approach is especially apt to evaluate strategies with uncertain results. For example, Scott and Watson (2013) use a utility maximization model to benchmark the efficacy of
Next, we evaluate the fund returns with respect to the Carhart (1997) 4-factor asset pricing model to get the risk-adjusted return, alpha. Specifically, for each fund 𝑖, we estimate 𝛼𝑖 using the
/2018, the company reported the losses of exchange rate in total of Baht 3 million, decreased by Baht 15 million from Q3/2018. This is due to currency fluctuation and the reduced amount of loan to
Company for the Company’s business operation. This shall reduce the fluctuation is money market that will help the Company to reduce the liability from loan and reduce the financial cost of the Company. 4.3
/2018, the company reported the losses of exchange rate in total of Baht 3 million, decreased by Baht 15 million from Q3/2018. This is due to currency fluctuation and the reduced amount of loan to
company revised its portfolio to manage oil price fluctuation. Whereas in Q3/2019, the refinery realized gain of THB 6 million. The refinery business realized slight inventory gain even when crude price