) being an incompetent or quasi-incompetent person; (3) being accused by the SEC Office or being prosecuted as a result of such 12 accusation regarding the following matters which relate to law on capital
after the date on which the court issued such order. Having been accused by the SEC on offences under 3, which is a ground for the SEC Office to file criminal complaint against such person with the
first paragraph shall consist of three persons. Where a fine fixing committee has fixed a fine for an offence and the alleged offender has paid the fine as determined by the fine fixing committee within
fixed a fine for an offence and the alleged offender has paid the fine as determined by the fine fixing committee within the period of time specified by the fine fixing committee, such case shall be
fixed a fine for an offence and the alleged offender has paid the fine as determined by the fine fixing committee within the period of time specified by the fine fixing committee, such case shall be
on July 15, 2016. The plaintiff and the defendant have been examined by the court hearing to hear the judgment dated November 27, 2560. The rest 3 cases are the criminal lawsuit against the debtor
Province Court, and the company was called as a co-defendant. Later, on 27 May 2019, entered into a compromise agreement, which the court has ordered according to the aforementioned compromise agreement, as
company was sued as black case no. Por 1430/2561 to Samut Sakhon Province Court, and the company was called as a co-defendant. Later, on 27 May 2019, entered into a compromise agreement, which the court has
relationship risk which is not more than medium level or which is in the acceptable level, unless having obtained exemption from the SEC Office; (5) having not been accused of or subjected to criminal proceeding
accused of or subjected to criminal proceeding, whether under Thai or foreign laws, concerning [i] unfair practice of trading securities or derivatives, or [ii] fraudulent, deceptive or unlawfully