Standard will re-evaluate the targets after the first round of projects. 17 More work will be required on methods to qualify conventional vehicle manufacturers under the Standard 18 50% better fuel economy

Microsoft Word - Forestry Criteria document_July 2020.docx Climate Bonds Initiative Forestry Criteria Document Forestry* Criteria The Forestry Criteria for the Climate Bonds Standard & Certification Scheme November 2018 * These Criteria also cover the conservation and restoration of non-forested land Assessing climate change mitigation and adaptation aspects of financial products is not straightforward. The benefit of having an authoritative standard eases decision-making and focuses attention o...

SECOND PARTY OPINION1 ON CHANEL’S SUSTAINABILITY-LINKED BOND FRAMEWORK September 2020 BACKGROUND CHANEL (hereafter the “Issuer”) contemplates including three environmental factors to the Sustainability-Linked Bonds (the “SLBs”) to be issued in compliance with the Sustainability-Linked Bond Framework (the “Framework”) created to govern their issuances and following the Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles (the “SLBP”). The Framework will include the Issuer’s commitment to achieve specific target...

: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of the results according to the objectives and goals of the Fund; (2) report the limitations or obstacles for the operation of the Fund; (3) report the operating results

personnel, the intermediary shall govern its personnel to comply with such standards. Clause 10 An intermediary shall not make a contract with a client in a manner of release or limit its liability for damage

. provision regarding the release or substitution of assets securing the issue. C. Guarantees Provide information about the guarantors and the main features and terms of guarantees. The information shall cover

c. provision regarding the release or substitution of assets securing the issue. D. Liens In case of issuing secured debt securities, disclose the kind and priority of any lien securing the issue, as

the asset value under the present conditions as much as possible. Therefore, it is the opinion of the IFA that the most appropriate approach to evaluate the asset is the Adjusted Book Value Approach

utility measure.” A utility approach is especially apt to evaluate strategies with uncertain results. For example, Scott and Watson (2013) use a utility maximization model to benchmark the efficacy of

Next, we evaluate the fund returns with respect to the Carhart (1997) 4-factor asset pricing model to get the risk-adjusted return, alpha. Specifically, for each fund 𝑖, we estimate 𝛼𝑖 using the