retail investors brings up the issue of whether a cognitive bias is influencing their decision. • One possible explanation could be based on a misconception that at threshold prices, an up-move of one tick
identify as early as possible problems that put significant investment value at risk. If they have concerns they should seek to ensure that the appropriate members of the investee company’s board or
beneficial governance and control, good corporate governance is not possible. A sound disclosure regime was identified as critical because there is a risk that controlling beneficial owners, with large voting
. The Board of Directors, therefore, has assigned the management of the Company to conduct a study on impacts and possible solutions. Subsequently, the Board of Directors has received the result of the
. The Board of Directors, therefore, has assigned the management of the Company to conduct a study on impacts and possible solutions. Subsequently, the Board of Directors has received the result of the
, the Board of Directors has been informed about the change in the project. The Board of Directors, therefore, has assigned the management of the Company to conduct a study on impacts and possible
project. The Board of Directors, therefore, has assigned the management of the Company to conduct a study on impacts and possible solutions. Subsequently, the Board of Directors has received the result of
change in the project. The Board of Directors, therefore, has assigned the management of the Company to conduct a study on impacts and possible solutions. Subsequently, the Board of Directors has received
developing criteria Our starting point The approach for developing criteria is defined in the introduction to the Climate Bond Standard.4 To the maximum degree possible, it aims to adopt a positive technology
specified in the relevant documentation of the specific transaction (e.g. Final Terms of the relevant SLB). The Issuer will notify the investors of the achievement or not of the SPT as soon as possible and in