Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
. Zait Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its accounting
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
accounting department recorded such fake entries as income and accrued income in the total of 691 million baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 in
accounting department recorded such fake entries as income and accrued income in the total of 691 million baht. The public prosecutor issued a final non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act