Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1
and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed
TCMA, this sanction is imposed on a Trustee and its director, manager or person responsible for the operation. (or Civil Penalty) is imposed on an offender for these following offenses under SEA and DAB
others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Sections 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the public
the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. On June 9, 2011, the accused filed an appeal to the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 03/09/2009
/ (Decrease) Percentage Sea Freight 150.77 178.21 (27.44) (15.40) Air Freight 192.94 105.73 87.21 82.48 Logistics Management 85.47 71.76 13.71 19.11 Total Service Revenue 429.18 355.70 73.48 20.66 1. Revenue
violating the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).On February 21, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand sentenced Kanchana to a five-year imprisonment for violating Section 315 in conjunction