later filed with the SET on November 14, 2019 (STHAI submitted the reviewed financial statements for Q2/2019 instead of the financial report for the first half of the fiscal year 2019). SEC Act S.56(4
ended December, 2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On December 24, 2014, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay fines of Baht 272,000 and Baht 258,000 respectively. Since
statements for Q2/2009 with SEC and the SET within specified period. The Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 60,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an
year 2012, (3) the annual registration statement for the year 2012 (Form 56-1, 2012), and (4) the annual report for the year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The
statements for Q1/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representative failed and the statute
year 2012 (Form 56-2, 2012), and (5) the reviewed financial statements for Q1/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged
financial statements for Q1/2013 and Q2/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 347,500 and a further fine
financial statements for Q2/2010 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor prosecuted the alleged offender in case of failure to supervise SECC to submit the financial