was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. Since Nittimon had refused to enter the settlement process, the SEC filed the complaint with
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.312 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.312 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn
Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., imprisonment for up to two years or a
violation to Section 241 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. All of the six individuals above had agreed to enter the settlement process. The Settlement Committee consequently fined