are not the SET members will be allowed to send trading orders through the SET ?s trading system in cases where such system is linked with others, such as that of foreign exchanges.  Also included in

either contract amount or price. {A} then submitted derivatives trading orders on the client's behalf whereas the client affirmed that he had learned of the trading and allowed {A} to do so. Making

benefit.Following a report of Bualuang Securities Plc., on {A} case the SEC probed into the case and found that he used computer with Bualuang Securities' IP Address to submit the trading orders via client's internet

client of trading orders via telephone at the end of the trading day.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

and volume. In addition, a number of trading orders were also matched within the group to induce the public into the trading of RICH shares.  Previously, the Settlement Committee on January 22, 2014

into the case and found that {A} submitted trading orders for EIC securities on the client's behalf, during the period of tender offer launched by such client.  In so doing, {A} failed to inform the

submitted the client?s securities trading orders via the internet from the IP address of Krungsri Securities for a certain period of time. Wasana admitted and explained that her client was not keen on

securities. In addition, it was found that a client of {B} asked her to make trading decision on his behalf while {C} submitted the client's securities trading orders via the internet from the IP address of

? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain.  This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of

derivatives trading decisions on the client's behalf.  Upon her client's inquiry, she then informed the client of the transactions which the orders had already been entered or executed. {A} had obtained such