in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56(1)(2)(3)(4) and199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018

for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018, the

fine. The jail term was suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was

over the previous year, with some findings in the substantive procedures of complex transactions or transactions that required intensive judgment. The firms can remedy deficiencies by increasing the

2,666,666.67 Baht fine. The jail term was suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The

judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount

lawsuit on behalf of all injured persons. Once the Court gives judgment, the judgment shall have the consequence of binding all members of the class even though they are not the parties in the lawsuit. The

transactions or those that required considerable amount of professional judgment, the smaller firms’ shortage was instead at the audit partner level, resulting in some audit partners both holding quite a sizable

, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of