3,855 7,639 50% Cost of sale - idle costs 0 58 100% Cost of sale - (Reverse of) loss on devaluation of inventories (50) 36 241% Total cost of sale 3,805 7,733 51% Selling expenses 48 94 50% Administrative
142% Cost of sale - idle costs 67 0 100% Cost of sale - (Reverse of) loss on devaluation of inventories 6 0 322995% Total cost of sale 7,591 3,105 144% Selling expenses 92 43 112% Administrative
% Cost of sale - idle costs 58 0 100% Cost of sale - (Reverse of) loss on devaluation of inventories 36 20 78% Total cost of sale 7,733 3,310 134% Selling expenses 94 42 126% Administrative expenses 126
- idle costs 0 181 100% Cost of sale - (Reverse of) loss on devaluation of inventories 6 (85) (107%) Total cost of sale 2,801 3,701 24% Selling expenses 43 45 5% Administrative expenses 116 131 11% Loss on
emissions per p-km and t-km than other modes of travel. Table 4 shows various relevant emissions estimates from the literature for rail and road. From these figures it can reasonably be inferred that direct
; Madueno et al., 2016; Nicolosi et al., 2014). A latent variable is not directly observed but rather inferred from other proxies that can be measured. Given several sub-varieties of latent variable analysis
and near market value Payment term By cash with 180 days of credit term The reason To reduce the idle equipments in order to create maximum benefits for the Company and its subsidiary, CCET sold the old
Cost of sale - Cost of goods sold 5,627 4,405 28% Cost of sale - idle costs 134 69 94% - Loss on devaluation of inventories (Reversal) 77 67 15% Total cost of sale 5,838 4,542 29% Selling expenses 107 97
of goods sold 7,085 5,248 35% - Idle cost - 72 -100% - Loss on devaluation of inventories (Reversal) (122) (32) 279% Total cost of sale 6,963 5,288 32% Selling expenses 153 114 34% Administrative
18,225,267,129 29,635,851,220 -63% - Idle cost 1,031,503,026 400,183,219 61% - Loss on devaluation of inventories (Reversal of) 20,966,163 159,314,204 -660% Total Cost of sale 19,277,736,318 30,195,348,643 -57