and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the

(2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to

sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 1,739,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a total fine of Baht 869,500 and a further fine of Baht 500 Baht each

public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244

accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed

prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

August 8, 2013, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 91,800. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 45,900

August 8, 2013, the Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 73,400. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 36,700