amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 and Section 63(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 which contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and
’ qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT
concerning the limitation of the voting rights and the disclosure requirement over the one-third rule so that asset management companies can disclose such information to investors. The afore-mentioned
September 30, 2014.Earlier, the SEC notified STHAI to rectify its 2012 financial statements due to the limitation on scope of audit imposed by the company management in various matters including quantities
underwriting without limitation to only debt securities, excluding company licensed to also undertake finance business. “Finance and securities company” means a company licensed to undertake finance business
limitation to only debt securities, excluding company licensed to also undertake finance business. “Finance and securities company” means a company licensed to undertake finance business, and securities
category of securities finance business, mutual fund management, securities brokerage, investment advisory service, securities dealing or securities underwriting without limitation to only debt securities
return, however, the highest return was shown in case of foreign investors while the lowest was the case of retail investors, when measured by investor category. This was caused by the limitation in
auditors were unable to express opinions due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the companies? managements. AIE and AI must submit to the SEC and publicly disclose the rectified and audited 2014
considered such report.Previously, the SEC had notified AIE and AI to rectify their 2014 financial statements as the auditors were unable to express opinions due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the