thier own benefits, which fraudulently caused damage to PICNI's property, violating Section 307, 308, 311. The Appeal Court sustained the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006

Mr. Porames Laongsuwan Mr. Porames Laongsuwan aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal

Mr. Pinij Putrasart Mr. Pinij Putrasart aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court

Mr. Piriya Thawon Mr. Piriya Thawon aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court

Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank

cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition and caused damages to other investors. 15/12/2020 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court

penalty to be imposed on the offender.    Appeal Any person who is affected by, and disagrees with, an administrative order has the right to appeal such order. The appeal procedure is provided by the SEC

’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the

our booth to check their readiness for fundraising in the ?Pride of the Provinces? and the ?Pride in Thai Innovative and Creative Businesses? zones.  Last but certainly not least, at ?A thousand baht

raising channel for start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and technology-based and creative businesses as well as business restructure to have access to financial support from investing