Nuprapat and Kanchana with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court and the Appeal Court ruled against Nuprapat and Kanchana and sentenced them to a five-year imprisonment for
, 2014, the Criminal Court ruled against Ratchasak, Phongsak, and Siriporn for violating Sections 306 and 312 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 and 343 of the Penal Code. They were sentenced to 8
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
lawsuit against them with the Bangkok South Criminal Court.The Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against both defendants as principals on two counts in accordance with Section 42 Chor (1), (2) of the
forgery in contravention of Sections 307, 308, 311 and 315 of SEA and Sections 264 and 268 of the Penal Code. The Criminal Court, on October 28, 2014, ruled that Shisiro, Pisan and Kanchanok (or
sanctions imposed by the Civil Sanction Committee. However, if any offender declines to comply with the civil sanctions ruled by the Civil Sanction Committee, SEC will seek an assistance from Public
civil sanction. However, if any offender declines to comply with the civil sanctions ruled by the Civil Sanction Committee, SEC will seek an assistance from Public Attorney to file a civil lawsuit with
Department of Economic Crime Litigation 4 of the Office of the Attorney- General. This resulted in a lawsuit filed against the defendant.On March 30, 2015, the Criminal Court ruled against Ratchasak for
Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not established any loss